As a result, conflicts involving AI complements are likely to unfold very differently than visions of AI substitution would suggest. Second, data and judgment will tend to become attractive targets in strategic competition. First, military organizations that adopt AI will tend to become more complex to accommodate the challenges of data and judgment across a variety of decision-making tasks. This has two important strategic implications. But these key complements-quality data and clear judgment-may not be present, or present to the same degree, in the uncertain and conflictual business of war. The advances in commercial machine learning that are reducing the costs of statistical prediction are simultaneously increasing the value of data (which enable prediction) and judgment (which determines why prediction matters). Yet AI is not a simple substitute for human decision-making. Recent scholarship on artificial intelligence (AI) and international security focuses on the political and ethical consequences of replacing human warriors with machines.
0 kommentar(er)
